Re: Why polecat and colugos are failing to build back branches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, robert(at)logicalchaos(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why polecat and colugos are failing to build back branches
Date: 2011-06-14 21:45:25
Message-ID: 8994.1308087925@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 06/13/2011 08:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I looked into $SUBJECT. There appear to be two distinct issues:
>> ...

> I think we can be a bit more liberal about build patches than things
> that can affect the runtime behaviour.

> So +1 for fixing both of these.

I've committed patches that fix these issues on my own OS X machine,
though it remains to be seen whether polecat and colugos will like
them. It turns out that whatever setup Robert has got with
'/Volumes/High Usage/' is really *not* fully exercising the system
as far as space-containing paths go, because I found bugs in all
active branches when I tried to do builds and installs underneath
'/Users/tgl/foo bar/'. Is it worth setting up a buildfarm critter
to exercise the case on a long-term basis? If we don't, I think
we can expect that it'll break regularly.

(I wouldn't care to bet that the MSVC case works yet, either.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-06-14 21:50:30 Re: procpid?
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2011-06-14 21:41:00 Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID