Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Synchronized snapshots versus multiple databases
Date: 2011-10-22 15:28:07
Message-ID: 8990.1319297287@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> 1 *and* 4 please.

Given the lack of enthusiasm I'm not going to do anything about #4 now.
Somebody else can add it later.

> So, unless explicitly requested, an exported snapshot is limited to
> just one database. If explicitly requested to be transportable, we can
> use the snapshot in other databases.

Yeah, we could make it work like that when it gets added.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2011-10-22 15:37:51 Re: database file encryption.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-10-22 15:20:26 Re: So, is COUNT(*) fast now?