Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

From: Haribabu kommi <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date: 2013-12-06 06:40:00
Message-ID: 8977CB36860C5843884E0A18D8747B0372BF2316@szxeml558-mbs.china.huawei.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05 December 2013 21:16 Amit Kapila wrote:
> Note -
> a. Performance is data is taken on my laptop, needs to be tested on
> some better m/c b. Attached Patch is just a prototype of chunkwise
> concept, code needs to be improved and decode
> handling/test is pending.

I ran the performance test on linux machine and attached the results in the mail.

Regards,
Hari babu.

Attachment Content-Type Size
test_readings_lzsnappyhas_robinhash.txt text/plain 3.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2013-12-06 06:59:29 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2013-12-06 06:26:52 Re: Heavily modified big table bloat even in auto vacuum is running