Re: Built-in binning functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Built-in binning functions
Date: 2014-09-07 19:05:35
Message-ID: 8944.1410116735@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Tom, are you planning to take this one?

Yeah, I already looked at it once, so will take it.

I think the main remaining issue is that we don't have consensus on
the function name AFAICT. I'm okay with using width_bucket(), as
is done in the latest patch, but there were objections ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-09-07 19:09:26 Re: Built-in binning functions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-09-07 18:59:16 Re: Built-in binning functions