Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Date: 2006-09-04 02:41:48
Message-ID: 8920.1157337708@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Anyway, let me reiterate: bz has at least the start of an email reply
> facility, and making that work if it doesn't already should not be
> beyond us.

I agree that starting from scratch seems like a good way to waste a
lot of time. I don't have a preference for BZ over debbugs or the
others that have been mentioned, but I'd suggest starting with something
that exists and trying to adapt it. If you end up throwing it away and
starting over, well, you'll have spent a lot less time on the trial
version than if you insist on coding from scratch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-04 02:43:57 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-09-04 02:32:39 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta