From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Concurrent psql patch |
Date: | 2007-05-21 13:21:50 |
Message-ID: | 87ps4ul3bl.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> Attached is an updated patch.
>>
>
> This patch appears to add a nonexistent test to the regression schedules.
I must have forgotten to cvs add it. Sorry.
Also, I forgot to mention previously there is an unrelated trivial hunk in
here. I noticed we free the password early, presumably for security reasons,
but don't actually overwrite the memory at that point. I added a memset in
there, otherwise the free seems kind of pointless. I normally don't bother
with "security" features like that since they don't really add any security
but as long as it's there it may as well do something vaguely useful.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
concurrent-psql-v9.patch.gz | application/octet-stream | 22.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-05-21 13:23:30 | Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server |
Previous Message | Usama Munir | 2007-05-21 13:20:48 | pg_get_tabledef |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-05-21 13:34:23 | Re: UTF8MatchText |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-21 09:48:59 | Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert |