Re: Extensions User Design

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Extensions User Design
Date: 2009-06-25 08:58:16
Message-ID: 87ocsc8zbr.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> Also, this means that we'll want to make sure that PGXS is included in all
>> existing packages of PostgresQL.  Is it?
>
> Apologies if I missed further discussion on this - I'm somewhat
> distracted with release preparations at the moment...

Yeah, wasn't the best timing for me to open the thread, but I've been
sitting on it what seemed far too much time...

> PGXS is essentially useless on Windows unless you're compiling your
> own code using Mingw/msys, which will be a miniscule percentage of
> users. Our installers for 8.3 and above are all built using VC++.

I guess we'll have to see how the windows world installers are
comparable / compatible with PGXS here, I confess I know nothing about
them...

Is it possible to design this part of the extension system with only
PGXS in mind and later adapt the windows toolsuite?

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-06-25 09:21:35 Re: Extensions User Design
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-06-25 08:24:40 Re: Extensions User Design