Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS
Date: 2014-09-19 18:04:11
Message-ID: 87oaubo5nu.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Josh" == Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:

Josh> (b) If we're going to discuss ripping out YAML format, please
Josh> let's do that as a *separate* patch and discussion,

+infinity

>> Grouping Sets:
>> - ["two","four"]
>> - ["two"]
>> - []
>>
>> Would that be better? (It's not consistent with other YAML outputs
>> like sort/group keys, but it's equally legal as far as I can tell
>> and seems more readable.)

Josh> That works for me.

I prefer that one to any of the others I've come up with, so unless anyone
has a major objection, I'll go with it.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-09-19 18:04:39 Re: Turning off HOT/Cleanup sometimes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-09-19 17:58:17 Re: removing volatile qualifiers from lwlock.c