Re: win32 performance - fsync question

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: win32 performance - fsync question
Date: 2005-02-17 22:14:24
Message-ID: 87is4qygu7.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> writes:

> So Linux is indeed doing a cache flush on fsync

Actually I think the root of the problem was precisely that Linux does not
issue any sort of cache flush commands to drives on fsync. There was some talk
on linux-kernel of what how they could take advantage of new ATA features
planned on new SATA drives coming out now to solve this. But they didn't seem
to think it was urgent or worth the performance hit of doing a complete cache
flush.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2005-02-17 23:41:54 Re: win32 performance - fsync question
Previous Message Sergey E. Koposov 2005-02-17 20:57:53 Re: Strange RETURN NEXT behaviour in Postgres 8.0