"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Joachim Wieland wrote:
>> Attached is the long-awaited guc patch that makes values fall back to
>> their default values when they got removed (or commented) from the
>> configuration file. This has always been a source of confusion.
>
> I have applied your patch with some of the discussed corrections. The
> use of memory allocation in the GUC code might still need some review.
This is a pretty major user-visible change. While I'm strongly in favour of it
it seems like there ought to be some documentation file touched by this, no?
Or have I missed it?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com