| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: why do we need two snapshots per query? |
| Date: | 2011-12-16 16:53:58 |
| Message-ID: | 87iplgmp95.fsf@hi-media-techno.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I thought about adjusting it, but I didn't see what it made sense to
> adjust it to. It still is the parameter used for parameter I/O and
> parsing/planning, so the existing text isn't wrong. It will possibly
> also get reused for execution, but the previous statement has a
> lengthy comment on that, so it didn't seem worth recapitulating here.
Ah yes, the previous comment is not far away, so it's easy to read it
that way. Agreed.
> Actually, I did, but the change was in the second patch file attached
> to the same email, which maybe you missed? Combined patch attached.
Oops, I missed it, yes. Looks good to me.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2011-12-16 16:54:51 | Re: [PATCH] Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v3 |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2011-12-16 16:08:58 | Re: [PATCH] Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v3 |