Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE patch v1

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE patch v1
Date: 2011-01-05 09:19:23
Message-ID: 87fwt7vhb8.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> One could imagine that an extension was updated more quickly than
> PostgreSQL major versions come out, or at least not at the exact same
> time.

Sure, but I don't see what your proposed syntax is giving us here.
Currently the new version you're upgraded to is the one installed on the
file system, and whose .so has already been upgraded, and that's it.

I still need a better grasp at what your proposal is about to comment
and integrate, I fear.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-01-05 09:25:30 Re: Support for negative index values in array fetching
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2011-01-05 08:25:19 Re: sepgsql contrib module