Re: Triggers on columns

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Triggers on columns
Date: 2009-10-05 10:06:22
Message-ID: 87eipitash.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> In cases where you do have related functions, I suggest having
> SQL-callable V1 functions that absorb their arguments in this
> style, and then have them call a common subroutine that's a plain
> C function.

Unless you have high performance requirements, IME. Avoiding the SQL
function call is indeed measurable, even if very low in the radar.

Regards,
--
dim

You have a nice quote about the sins we'd accept/follow in the name of
performance, but google will about only find sin/cos etc material...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-10-05 10:06:40 Re: Privileges and inheritance
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-10-05 09:47:54 Re: Privileges and inheritance