Re: Commit fest queue

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, "Tom Dunstan" <pgsql(at)tomd(dot)cc>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit fest queue
Date: 2008-04-10 22:21:40
Message-ID: 87d4ox8i6j.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:

> Yes Alvaro but that doesn't mean the process should be complicated for
> the sake of being complicated.

This is all utter BS though. The current process is about as simple for a
submitter as it could possibly be:

1) If you want to send us a patch mail it to us.

2) For advanced users only: If you want to see our todo list it's over here;
feel free to add things to it if you want us to do something like, say,
give you feedback or commit your patch.

Anything else is *more* complex. It might be justified by how much it would
help us keep things organized and so on. But you have to come up with benefits
which outweigh the additional complexities, not claim your favourite software
is less complex than just keeping a todo list.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-04-10 22:27:27 Re: Commit fest queue
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-04-10 22:10:32 Re: Commit fest queue