Re: 8SEPostgres WAS: .4 release planning

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: 8SEPostgres WAS: .4 release planning
Date: 2009-01-26 23:11:42
Message-ID: 87d4e9hdch.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com> writes:

> Yes, I will look at them to the extent I am able. As I am not familiar with the
> postgresql codebase I won't be able to assert the correctness of the hook
> placement (that is, where the security functions are called with respect to the
> data they are protecting being accessed). The postgresql community should be
> more familiar with the hook call sites and hopefully can assist there.

I would suggest looking at the documentation (which I assume the patch does
update). If it's not clear that things are in order from the documentation
then either it needs better documentation or something's wrong...

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2009-01-26 23:23:25 Re: 8.4 release planning
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2009-01-26 23:11:11 Re: On SCM