| From: | Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition |
| Date: | 2016-07-14 17:51:47 |
| Message-ID: | 87d1mg2jm4.fsf@credativ.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> So I think changing the view definition and calling this function on
>> indexrelid will remove the error. So I think
>> correct fix is to change view definition, as I proposed in above patch.
[...]
> We've dealt with similar issues in places like pg_relation_size() by
> making the functions return NULL instead of throwing an error for an
> unmatched argument OID.
Note that Michael Paquier sent a patch implementing this in another
thread:
regards,
andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Seltenreich | 2016-07-14 18:04:03 | Re: Improving executor performance |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-07-14 16:32:10 | Re: Oddity in handling of cached plans for FDW queries |