Re: updated hstore patch

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: david(at)kineticode(dot)com ("David E(dot) Wheeler"), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: updated hstore patch
Date: 2009-09-21 23:57:42
Message-ID: 87bpl3etqh.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "David" == "David E Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:

>> But I checked, and delete(hstore,$1) still resolves to
>> delete(hstore,text) when the type of $1 is not specified, so there's
>> no compatibility issue there that I can see. (I'm not sure I
>> understand _why_ it resolves to that rather than being ambiguous...)

David> Right, but it does seem like it might be the best choice for
David> now. I'd add a regression test to make sure it stays that way.

I don't think there's any way to do that from the regression tests.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-22 00:13:48 Re: updated hstore patch
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-09-21 23:44:52 Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings