| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Buildfarm feature request: some way to track/classify failures |
| Date: | 2007-03-19 14:15:23 |
| Message-ID: | 873b41jp50.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>> row-ordering discrepancy in rowtypes test | 2007-02-10 03:00:02 | 3
>
> Is this because the test is fixed or unfixable? If not shouldn't the test get
> an ORDER BY clause so that it will reliably pass on future versions?
Hm, I took a quick look at this test and while there are a couple tests
missing ORDER BY clauses I can't see how they could possibly generate results
that are out of order. Perhaps the ones that do have ORDER BY clauses only
recently acquired them?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-03-19 14:25:27 | Re: modifying the tbale function |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-19 14:14:22 | Re: Indexam interface proposal |