Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "peter_e" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Git out of sync vs. CVS
Date: 2010-01-21 16:11:40
Message-ID: 8737.1264090300@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> So add me to the list of people who think that if
> these are going to be recurring, we should look at moving from cvs
> to git as soon as 9.0 is released.

The gating factor is not release schedule; it is the still-unaddressed
tasks that must be done before we can consider moving.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Switching_PostgreSQL_from_CVS_to_Git

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Leonardo F 2010-01-21 16:13:25 Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2010-01-21 16:09:35 Re: lock_timeout GUC patch