Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des(at)des(dot)no>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add ssl_protocols configuration option
Date: 2014-10-22 19:36:59
Message-ID: 86y4s7c2w4.fsf@nine.des.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des(at)des(dot)no> writes:
> > If I understand correctly, imaps has been shown to be vulnerable as
> > well, so I wouldn't be so sure.
> Reference?

Sorry, no reference. I was told that Thunderbird was vulnerable to
POODLE when talking imaps.

> Since you can already specify the cipher list, couldn't you just add
> -SSLv3 to the cipher list and be done?

I didn't want to change the existing behavior; all I wanted was to give
users a way to do so if they wish.

DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des(at)des(dot)no

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-10-22 20:10:26 Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-10-22 19:28:15 Re: BUG: *FF WALs under 9.2 (WAS: .ready files appearing on slaves)