Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?
Date: 2013-07-09 18:21:57
Message-ID: 865.1373394117@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On 7/9/13 10:40 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> This is actually a pretty trivial task. Here is a simple perl version:

> But that would make Perl a hard build requirement.

My opinion is that this script should only run if you've changed some
catalog .h files. Requiring Perl in those cases is no worse than what
we already require it for (cf the keyword crosscheck script mentioned
upthread).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Wanner 2013-07-09 19:12:59 Re: Review: extension template
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-07-09 18:12:58 Re: Should we automatically run duplicate_oids?