Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sandeep Thakkar <sandeep(dot)thakkar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Date: 2017-11-30 04:45:35
Message-ID: 84953.1512017135@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:34:56PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I don't really have an opinion about the relative merits of these changes,
>> but why do anything? The existing solution has the buildfarm happy, and
>> we've not heard any field complaints that I saw. I'm not sure we should
>> spend more time on supporting obsolete toolchain combinations that aren't
>> represented in the buildfarm.

> It's the other way around. The buildfarm's 32-bit MSVC animals each use an
> obsolete Perl. PostgreSQL is incompatible with today's 32-bit ActivePerl and
> Strawberry Perl.

Oh, OK. In that case, we need to get some representatives of these
more modern builds into the buildfarm while we're at it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 04:45:41 Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-11-30 04:44:17 Re: [HACKERS] log_destination=file