Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?
Date: 2009-03-14 20:04:36
Message-ID: 8453.1237061076@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> What I want to be able to do is to set different bunches of resource
> management settings for various non-login inherited roles, and be able
> to choose profiles via a SET ROLE. The reason to do this, btw, instead
> of defining various login roles, is that different login roles can't
> share the same connection pool.

The question is why this should be tied to SET ROLE, which already has
well defined semantics that don't include any such behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-03-14 20:27:03 Re: Has anybody think about changing BLCKSZ to an option of initdb?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-03-14 19:50:51 Re: hstore improvements?