Re: LLVM / clang

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "P(dot) Caillaud" <peufeu(at)peufeu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LLVM / clang
Date: 2010-06-11 15:23:10
Message-ID: 8077.1276269790@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> max_locks_per_xact != max_locks_per_xact)
>>
>> Looks like a bug.

> Ah, it should be compared with the same name field in ControlFile.

Yeah, obvious typo, please commit.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2010-06-11 15:36:31 Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-06-11 15:15:24 Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers