| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, darcy(at)dbitech(dot)ca, remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com, books(at)ejurka(dot)com, markw(at)osdl(dot)org, pete(at)economics(dot)utoronto(dot)ca, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Buildfarm issues on specific machines |
| Date: | 2005-07-19 18:29:08 |
| Message-ID: | 8077.1121797748@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 11:17:29PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> cuckoo [7.3, 7.2]: --enable-nls without OS support
>>
>> This looks like pilot error; but the later branches don't fail on this
>> machine, so did we change something in this area?
> Should I just stop using nls on 7.2 and 7.3 or does someone want to poke
> around with this further?
I don't intend to look at it; but perhaps someone who cares more about
the NLS code will ...
> Also, is -hackers the best place to ask about buildfarm issues, or
> should I post questions elsewhere?
hackers is definitely the place.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bowlby | 2005-07-19 18:31:11 | Re: question on some code. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-19 18:22:40 | Re: question on some code. |