| From: | Alban Hertroys <haramrae(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Andreatta <s(dot)andreatta(at)synedra(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: autoanalyze criteria |
| Date: | 2013-02-24 11:52:16 |
| Message-ID: | 7B8C1C0C-DA7E-4C4B-A8DB-CE63830F502C@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 23, 2013, at 14:11, Stefan Andreatta <s(dot)andreatta(at)synedra(dot)com> wrote:
> And we are still missing a number for rows updated since the last analyse.
In MVCC an update is an insert + delete, so you already got those numbers.
Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-02-24 16:56:54 | Re: Dumb question involving to_tsvector and a view |
| Previous Message | Jasen Betts | 2013-02-24 05:45:27 | Re: Dumb question involving to_tsvector and a view |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-02-24 12:30:15 | Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-02-24 08:44:54 | unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request) |