Re: pg_dump additional options for performance

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Date: 2008-02-11 23:21:26
Message-ID: 7B1B3E77-650F-4253-9D8E-B0B1AEAEEB42@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Feb 11, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Christopher Browne wrote:
> It seems better to me to have a suffix that suggests some sort of
> meaning. I'm not sure of the ideal names, but starting with:
> .pre-schema, .data, and .post-schema as possibilities seems like a
> route to get to possibly-better names...

+1

BTW, if people want to get anal with the names I think it's fine to
also have options to explicitly name the files, but for normal usage
I'd much rather have a simple option flag that just appends stuff to
--file.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2008-02-12 00:55:01 Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-02-11 23:18:25 Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan