Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 06/26/2014 03:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Do we actually want to document these things as both operators and
>> functions? If we do, then the right answer is to list them as known
>> exceptions in the opr_sanity test, not to hide the fact that we're
>> violating the general documentation policy.
> It's quite important that we have the variadic functions exposed.
Yeah, I suppose --- and at this point backwards compatibility would
demand it anyway. I'll go fix the regression test.
regards, tom lane