| From: | Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Phoenix Kiula <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question |
| Date: | 2007-08-15 15:06:57 |
| Message-ID: | 745725.37493.qm@web31807.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
--- Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Generally, for these kinds of things it's often best to use
> materialized views / rollup tables so that you aren't re-aggregating
> the same data over and over.
I don't know if this was already mentioned, but here is one of the links that describe the method
of implementing a materialized view.
http://www.jonathangardner.net/PostgreSQL/materialized_views/matviews.html
other useful docs like this one can be found here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.2
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phoenix Kiula | 2007-08-15 15:12:14 | Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-08-15 14:59:59 | Re: Yet Another COUNT(*)...WHERE...question |