Re: Operator class group proposal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Operator class group proposal
Date: 2006-12-16 19:53:55
Message-ID: 7451.1166298835@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:48:48AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Operator family" seems like it might be a good choice.
>>
>> I like this one more than opcluster. opfamily has a good ring to it also.

> +1 on opfamily.

Done, unless anyone really doesn't like it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-12-16 20:14:14 Re: Operator class group proposal
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-12-16 19:43:05 Re: Operator class group proposal