Re: Advisory Locks and Prepared Transactions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Rees <srees(at)pandora(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Advisory Locks and Prepared Transactions
Date: 2012-05-03 00:13:12
Message-ID: 7422.1336003992@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

[ sorry for slow response ]

Stephen Rees <srees(at)pandora(dot)com> writes:
> Code that works on Pg8.3 raises an error on Pg9.1, is this a bug?

Yes, it sure looks that way. Somebody decided they could mark userlocks
as transactional, which was probably a bad idea altogether, and
certainly wasn't followed up on adequately.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ben Madin 2012-05-03 02:37:09 SQLSTATE XX000 Internal Error 7
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-02 23:15:29 Re: Limit the normal user to see system catalog or not??? And create privilege???