Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Date: 2016-06-09 17:51:09
Message-ID: 7388.1465494669@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yes, let's fix it. This will also take care of the questions about
>> whether the GIN/GIST opclass tweaks I made a few months ago require
>> module version bumps.

> Tom, there's a patch for this at
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/574F091A.3050800@proxel.se which
> I think you should review, since you were the one who made the tweaks
> involved. Any chance you can do that RSN? If we want to get this
> done at all, we should really get it into beta2. Also, the patches
> Andreas posted for applying parallel-safety markings apply on top of
> that, so that needs to go in first, at least for the affected modules.

OK, I'll take it. You're done with Andreas' patches otherwise?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-06-09 17:57:15 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't generate parallel paths for rels with parallel-restricted
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-09 17:48:32 Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions