Re: location of the configuration files

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: location of the configuration files
Date: 2003-02-14 15:27:23
Message-ID: 7254.1045236443@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 12:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> If you want ps to display the data dir, you should use -D. Remember, it
>> is mostly important for multiple postmaster, so if you are doing that,
>> just use -D, but don't prevent single-postmaster folks from using
>> PGDATA.

> Could not the ps line be rewritten to show this, as the backend's ps
> lines are rewritten?

I for one would rather it didn't do that. I already set my postmaster
command lines the way I want 'em, and I don't want the code overriding
that. (I prefer to use explicit -p arguments to distinguish the various
postmasters I have running --- shorter and easier to read than explicit
-D would be. At least for me.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-14 15:30:07 Re: location of the configuration files
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-02-14 15:20:56 Re: location of the configuration files