Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Date: 2010-01-27 23:41:02
Message-ID: 714AF413-51E1-49B1-9348-6CFE4DF04E0B@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 27, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I don't have to read any further than the place where it says "doesn't
> work if you call both plperl and plperlu" to realize that that's quite
> false. Maybe we have different definitions of what a software
> interaction is...

I think that dates from when plperl and plperlu couldn't co-exists, which was fixed a few months ago, n'est pas?

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-27 23:54:03 Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-27 23:33:19 Re: Add on_perl_init and proper destruction to plperl [PATCH]