Re: bug/oversight in TestLib.pm and PostgresNode.pm

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug/oversight in TestLib.pm and PostgresNode.pm
Date: 2017-04-03 14:56:42
Message-ID: 7067a43e-b7d8-2897-43b7-c8c9ebffbbfc@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/22/17 11:51, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> While trying to test pgbench's stderr (looking for 'creating tables' in
> output of the initialisation step) I ran into these two bugs (or
> perhaps better 'oversights').

Perhaps pgbench should be printing progress messages to stdout instead?

> But especially the omission of command_fails_like() in PostgresNode.pm
> feels like an bug.

Yeah, that's just because no one has needed it yet.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-04-03 15:06:36 Re: Unable to build doc on latest head
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-03 14:52:52 Re: [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage