Re: operator exclusion constraints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints
Date: 2009-11-03 17:13:24
Message-ID: 7004.1257268404@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not excited about using NOT, because I think it has a hint of a
> double-negative when combined with EXCLUSION.

Well, the choice of EXCLUSION isn't set in stone either ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-03 17:18:41 Re: A small bug in gram.y
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-11-03 17:13:16 Re: EOL for 7.4?