From: | Edvin Syse <es(at)syse(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is it possible to get the Payload from a NOTIFY via the JDBC Driver? |
Date: | 2011-08-29 09:16:59 |
Message-ID: | 6C37221E818AD94EB8593F2D10B7D62611A9B9@EX-2010-01.ad.sdhosting.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
> This works with 9.0 and newer server versions. The JDBC driver didn't
> need any changes to make that happen, so the comment never got
> updated.
Sweet, thanks :)
> > I'm also curious to know if there are any plans to implement async
> > support for notifications.
> >
>
> Meaning a callback mechanism or just not needing to issue queries to the
> server? Currently the JDBC driver supports an intermediate method
> depending on your connection type. You only need to poll
> PGConnection.getNotifications, not issue server queries as long as you
> aren't connected via SSL. The driver uses InputStream.available to
> determine when a notification is pending which isn't supported on all
> InputStreams.
It would be nice to be able to attach a listener that gets notifications in realtime as they come over the wire, but if I understand you correctly, I can atleast let a thread poll regularily, and it will not create any network traffic, right? Is there a way to attach a listener with today's architecture?
-- Edvin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | dexdyne | 2011-08-30 09:51:25 | Re: time zone setting. |
Previous Message | Ian Pilcher | 2011-08-26 17:14:32 | Re: PreparedStatement syntax extensions? |