Re: New regression test time

From: Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New regression test time
Date: 2013-06-30 07:33:00
Message-ID: 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C38421BBB99@szxeml558-mbs.china.huawei.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But
>> we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to
>> split our tests either.

>I have done a POC. See:

> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1170

I think it is better to submit for next commit fest which is at below link:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=19

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2013-06-30 09:10:46 Re: Request for Patch Feedback: Lag & Lead Window Functions Can Ignore Nulls
Previous Message Amit kapila 2013-06-30 07:28:19 Re: Move unused buffers to freelist