From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Kenneth Marshall" <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Mark Kirkwood" <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Date: | 2006-08-17 16:56:40 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FB3E@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I'm not sure I follow this, since currently anyone can
> email the bugs
> > list or use the bugs -> email form from the website. Are
> you looking
> > to increase the barrier for bug reporting?
>
> Any garbage (ie. spam) is generally filtered before it hits
> the -bugs list itself
Spam: Yes.
Non-bug-reports: Absolutely not.
The majority of things on -bugs are *not* bug reports, from what I can
tell...
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-17 16:58:03 | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-17 16:56:15 | Improvement for logging bind parameters |