From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: insert performance for win32 |
Date: | 2005-11-04 18:21:02 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E7F6@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> > I'm inclined to treat this as an outright bug, not just a minor
> certainly...
>
> > performance issue, because it implies that a sufficiently long psql
> > script would probably crash a Windows machine.
>
> actually, it's worse than that, it's more of a dos on the
> whole system, as windows will eventually stop granting
> handles, but there is a good chance of side effects on other
> applications.
Does it actually use up *handles* there? I don't see anything in the
docs that says it should do that - and they usually do document when
handles are used. You should be seeing a *huge* increase in system
handles very fast if it does, right?
That said, I definitly agree with calling it a bug :-)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-11-04 18:21:07 | Re: [HACKERS] insert performance for win32 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-04 18:19:02 | Re: [HACKERS] insert performance for win32 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-11-04 18:21:07 | Re: [HACKERS] insert performance for win32 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-04 18:19:02 | Re: [HACKERS] insert performance for win32 |