| From: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-04 15:32:43 |
| Message-ID: | 6647476749549464427@unknownmsgid |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 4 sep 2014, at 17:18, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> You just need a ISAM API for Postgres, That is all.
Now you are being ironic, and I would prefer to keep the discussion on
a serious level. You know that's not applicable in my case, you know
what I do for work and what kind of system we already have.
I *love* plpgsql and our development method. I just want it to get
slightly more convenient and secure.
When you suggest ISAM, that's like saying "demolish your house and
build a new one" when all I want is to make small but important
changes to what I already do as a professional on a daily basis.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2014-09-04 15:45:51 | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-09-04 15:18:03 | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |