Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 6 February 2013 14:38, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Yeah, I am doing this right now and the "shared" name doesn't seem so
>> good. "libpgframework" sounds decent. So since libpgport comes from
>> src/port, are we okay with src/framework and src/include/framework?
> "common" ?
> src/backend/common
> src/include/common
To me the term "framework" carries a lot of baggage that doesn't fit
this usage. "common" seems better.
regards, tom lane