From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, filip(at)jirsak(dot)org, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #13810: cursor_to_xml ignores tableforest parameter |
Date: | 2017-05-08 14:30:21 |
Message-ID: | 6528.1494253821@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 5/5/17 15:01, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think this is missing an update for the documentation. Section 9.14.4
>> describes the wrapping nodes as being <tablename> --- don't we want that
>> to match reality a bit better?
> It also says "If no table name is available, that is, when mapping a
> query or a cursor, the string `table` is used in the first format, `row`
> in the second format.", so I think it's correct and complete. (Could
> have more examples perhaps, but not critical to bug fix backpatch.)
OK, fair enough.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-05-08 16:28:38 | Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-05-08 14:26:55 | Re: BUG #13810: cursor_to_xml ignores tableforest parameter |