| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: initdb and fsync |
| Date: | 2012-07-13 18:19:44 |
| Message-ID: | 6387.1342203584@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 07:22:02 PM Jeff Davis wrote:
>> Right now I'm inclined to leave the patch as-is.
> Fine with that, I wanted to bring it up and see it documented.
> I have marked it with ready for committer. That committer needs to decide on -
> N in the regression tests or not, but that shouldn't be much of a problem ;)
I'm picking up this patch now. What I'm inclined to do about the -N
business is to commit without that, so that we get a round of testing
in the buildfarm and find out about any portability issues, but then
change to use -N after a week or so. I agree that in the long run
we don't want regression tests to run with fsyncs by default.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-13 19:21:27 | Re: initdb and fsync |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-07-13 17:52:30 | Re: pl/perl and utf-8 in sql_ascii databases |