Re: PQexecParams

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PQexecParams
Date: 2005-03-16 15:39:15
Message-ID: 6245.1110987555@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
>> Even binary data? ie. You could upload a binary string straight into
>> PQexecParams with no octal conversion?

> Well, what it means you do not have to escape data at the protocol level
> you don't have to be concerned about formatting the query string.
> However the server still may still need to interpret the data for
> storage...meaning for the bytea type at least you have to do octal
> encoding (at least that's what I do, I'd like nothing better than to be
> corrected on this point).

Not if you send the bytea parameter in binary format. If you send it in
text format that's true.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Moran.Michael 2005-03-16 15:46:23 contrib/pgcrypto
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-16 15:24:26 Re: read-only database