From: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki |
Date: | 2006-09-04 03:30:13 |
Message-ID: | 61929.69.197.146.229.1157340613.squirrel@69.197.146.229 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Martijn van Oosterhout said:
> Ok, it looks like pages can be arranged hierarchically.
Well, a prefix like "Todo:" is not the incantation one needs to use to
arrange pages in hierarchies. You probably want "/" to indicate a subpage:
i.e. "Parent/Child". See
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Link#Subpage_feature
> It would seems like pages named:
>
> Todo:<todo topic>
>
> would be a good idea for detailed info on todo items (and progress
> info).
I suggest you just give pages names that describe the content of the page,
and then have a category for all the pages that constitute TODO items.
See:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Category
-Neil
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-04 03:44:48 | Re: @ versus ~, redux |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-04 03:18:49 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2006-09-04 05:30:48 | Re: Getting better Google search results |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-09-04 03:01:16 | Re: gBorg status? |