Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
Date: 2010-12-17 21:15:20
Message-ID: 6074.1292620520@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Allright, what do you want to call the other bit, then? BM_SKIP_XLOG_FLUSH?

Like I said, I'd be tempted to invert the sense, so that the flag is set
for normal relations. Then it becomes something like BM_FLUSH_XLOG.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-12-17 21:17:56 Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2010-12-17 21:13:27 Re: proposal : cross-column stats