"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> Agreed on all accounts ... which is why this time, I want to do a proper
> branch when beta starts ... hell, from what I've seen suggested here so
> far, we have no choice ... At least then we can 'rip out' something from
> the beta tree without having to remove and re-add it to the development
> one later, hoping that they're changes haven't been affected by someone
> else's ...
Well, let's give that a try and see how it goes. I'm a bit worried
about the amount of double-patching we'll have to do, but other projects
seem to manage to cope with multiple active branches...
regards, tom lane