| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown |
| Date: | 2010-03-04 15:56:26 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f071003040756j1360e350s6402e061f22d92f3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> There is no post about this for over a month. Can I remove this
>>> from TODO item of SR for 9.0? Thought? Objection?
>>>
>>
>> Does smart shutdown still fail to shut down a slave?
>
> Yes. More precisely, smart shutdown during recovery does not complete
> until recovery ends.
Well, I don't think we should let smart shutdown just never terminate
when standby_mode = on. That's really a minefield for the unwary. I
think we either need to make it work, or somehow give the user an
error that says "try a different shutdown mode".
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-03-04 16:00:27 | Assertion failure twophase.c (2) (testing HS/SR) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-03-04 15:46:22 | Re: Linux start script updates |