Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?
Date: 2009-12-14 15:53:04
Message-ID: 603c8f070912140753w4941d5c5qbf8c0c240b88c70b@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 09:14 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> > If we are going to run pgindent anyway, what is the point?
>>
>> Perhaps it would take less time to run this than to argue the point?:
>>
>> sed -e 's/[ \t][ \t]*$//' -e 's/  *\t/\t/g' *
>
> Not certain that is exactly correct, plus it doesn't only work against a
> current patch since there are already many examples of whitespace in CVS
> already. I do appreciate your attempts at resolution and an easy
> tool-based approach for the future, though I'll let someone else run
> with it.

Yeah, that would actually be a disaster, because it would actually add
deltas to the patch in the short term.

Seems to me that we would be better off figuring out which exact ident
Bruce is running and checking the typedef list into CVS.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-14 15:56:13 Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-12-14 15:52:19 Re: Hot Standby, release candidate?